Immanuel Kant and Herman Cohen’s philosophy of religion

نویسندگان

چکیده

The article analyzes the main characteristic features of philosophy religion founder Marburg school neo-Kantianism Hermann Cohen. Special attention is paid to Cohen’s criticism and reinterpretation Kant’s “practical philosophy” from point view religion: Cohen supplements expands provisions on moral law duty, interpreting them as divine commandments. authors emphasize fundamental importance for “internal similarity” between ethical teaching Judaism. sources own ideas about Jewish tradition are shown, which include work Moses Mendelssohn “Jerusalem” “Theologicalpolitical treatise” by Baruch Spinoza. these works analyzed an much consideration attitude Spinoza’s philosophical legacy in general. interpretation postulates Judaism (and their “inner kinship” with philosophy) ethical, logical, political contexts presented. understanding such religious-philosophical doctrinal phenomena law, grace, Revelation, teaching, Torah, messianism, freedom, Old Testament New Testament, etc. provided analyzed. points religious “ethical monotheism” considered; particular, analyze his idea God “the only one”, highlighted Paul Natorp. It concluded that religion, based well philosophy”, could be characterized terms monotheism”, “universalism” “humanism”.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Kant and Demystification of Ethics and Religion

Kant's demystification is meant to put away any metaphysical and revealed elements from ethics and religion. Kant, fulfilling this, first argues that metaphysical questions of reason, from theoretical aspect, have no certain answers. In practical reason, he establishes his moral foundations, based on own human being without any referring to metaphysical bases. In fact, Kant places human being a...

متن کامل

Hilary Putnam And Immanuel Kant: Two 'Internal Realists'?

Since 1976 Hilary Putnam has drawn parallels between his ‘internal’, ‘pragmatic’, ‘natural’ or ‘common-sense’ realism and Kant’s transcendental idealism. Putnam reads Kant as rejecting the then current metaphysical picture with its in-built assumptions of a unique, mind-independent world, and truth understood as correspondence between the mind and that ready-made world. Putnam reads Kant as ove...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: ??????? ?????-?????????????? ????????????. ????????? ? ??????????????

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2542-2278', '2541-9382']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.103